Chic Notes
Home Chic List Trend and Style Chic Notes Contests Men Stuff
More Stuff
Featured Style
Style Feature
Men Stuff
Men Stuff
The Chic List
Chic List
The Kardashians’ Signature “K”
Might be in Double Trouble!!

   he Kardashian sisters recently launched a new
cosmetics line and selected “KHROMA BEAUTY BY
KOURTNEY, KIM AND KHLOE” as their trademark.
However, there are two other cosmetic brands that use
a similar mark – “CHROMA” and “KROMA.” The Kard-
ashians were asked by each to change their mark, but
upon failed attempts to reach any solutions, legal
actions were initiated.

Chroma makeup studio is located in Beverly
Hills and is owned by Michael Rey. Rey filed for
trademark infringement on November 19, 2012
in the Central District of California. The action
was filed against Boldface Licensing + Branding,
Inc., who holds the licensing rights to the
Kardashian sisters’ names and likenesses.
Rey asserts that he has worked twelve hard
years to build his brand, which now includes
A-list clientele. He contends that the Kardashians’
line will cheapen his products and create
confusion in the marketplace because the simple
letter change is not enough to distinguish the
two cosmetic lines. Boldface filed their answer,
which denies that “CHROMA” has common law
trademark ownership rights that extend
I Want
I want T
nationwide or that the alleged mark is strong enough and well known in the Los Angeles area. Boldface commenced
a second action against Lee Tillett, owner of Kroma Makeup, on November 30, 2012 in the Central District of
California. Boldface is seeking a declaratory judgment that the use of trademarks incorporating “KHROMA” does
not infringe any of Tillett’s trademark rights for “KROMA.”

Tillett filed an answer and counterclaim for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, California trademark
infringement and unfair competition. Tillett alleges that this action arises out of the intentional, willful, malicious and
oppressive conduct of Boldface in disregarding Tillett’s rights. Tillett further alleges that “KHROMA” was advertised
and promoted in a way to saturate the market and potential customers are likely to be misled that “KROMA” is
associated with the Kardashian sisters. Tillett’s demand for relief is Boldface’s profits and treble, corrective
advertising and punitive damages.

Attorneys for both the Kardashians and Boldface assert that all necessary filings were made in order to obtain the
rights to use “KHROMA.” However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office records indicate that the examining
attorney issued an office action on September 26, 2012, which required Boldface to address the likelihood of
consumer confusion with the “KROMA” mark. The examining attorney found that “KHROMA” is almost identical in
appearance and pronunciation is the same as “KROMA.” The additional wording in the “KHROMA” mark fails to
distinguish the mark from “KROMA.” It was further found that both brands’ goods are cosmetics and are presumed
to move in all normal channels of trade. Boldface was given six months to present arguments in support of their
registration for “KHROMA” by addressing the issue of consumer confusion.

It is uncertain at this time how these issues will unfold since no trial dates have been scheduled. There have been
no indications of settlements. The Kardashians have made no indications that they will change their mark, as
products are already being sold online and advertised with the “KHROMA” mark.   © 2013  All rights reserved.


E-mail Address

Join Our Mailing List
Home advertisement dresses. tops. skirts advertisement Chic Notes
Holiday  Gift Guide
Nail Polish Trend
Nail Trends
Bags under 200
Great Bags Under $200
Winter 2013
Winter Essentials
By: Shannon Moody
Wedge Sneakers
Current Obsession: Wedge Sneakers
More Stuff on FashionRooftop
Nolcha Fashion Week 2
Diana Simaan Collection
Nolcha FW: Andressa Leao
Trends: Nomad Chic
NYFW: Nina Skarra
NYFW Nina Skarra
Trends: Black & White
Eye Brows
Beauty & the Brow
Nomad Chic Spring 2013: Black & White